Showing posts with label Financial management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial management. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Do private equity owned businesses perform better?

Too Faced Cosmetics in Irvine, CA was sold in November 2016 to Estee Lauder Companies for $1.45 billion, almost for $1 billion more than acquired one year earlier by the seller, General Atlantic. 

General Atlantic, a New York private equity firm, acquired the business in 2015 from another private equity firm, Weston Presidio. 

Too Faced was co-founded in 1998 by Southern California entrepreneurs Jarod Blandino and Jeremy Johnson.

The founders sold Too Faced to Weston Presidio in 2012, for only $71 million.

How did Too Faced Cosmetics' value go from $71 million to $1.45 billion during the 2012 to 2016 period? 

There may be several explanations, but the key answer is in the way how private equity owned businesses are owned, managed, perform, and grow in value. 

It is commonly known that businesses owned by private equity firms do better, at least for short- and intermediate-term, than their industry peers.


Private equity imposes certain disciplines and models to force companies to succeed or at least satisfy its highly driven and monetary-oriented ownership. Companies are forced to immediately improve financial efficiency, performance, and continuity. Well-placed partners of private equity firms serve as company ambassadors, acting as connectors to valuable contacts and strategic opportunities.


A study by A.T. Kearney (leading global consultancy) revealed the following:
  1. Private equity owned companies generally outperform their industry peers, primarily in slow-growth industries, such as chemicals, large consumer goods and retail, manufacturing and business services.
  2. Contrary to popular belief, PE firms that take on a supervisory role—giving the deal partner responsibility from acquisition through exit— deliver more value by balancing growth and profitability.
  3. Success factors of PE firm models are transferable for those willing to learn.

Why private equity firms love cash?

PE players look at their balance sheet not as static indicators of performance, but a dynamic tools for growth. One critical component of this approach is to aggressively manage down working capital.

Lessons from private equity any company can learn
Bain & Company, a consulting giant which has succeeded as a private equity investor as well, offers a list of lessons any company can learns from private equity:
  • Define the full potential. The target is to increase equity value - how to turn $1 of equity value today into $3, $4, or $5 tomorrow. 
  • Develop the blueprint. The blueprint is the road map for reaching your full potential - the who, what, when, and how. 
  • Accelerate performance. This involves molding the organization to the blueprint, matching talent to key initiatives, and getting people to own them. 
  • Harness the talent. This requires creating the right incentives to recruit, retain, and motivate your best talent - and get them to think and act like owners. 
  • Make equity sweat. This calls for managing working capital aggressively, disciplining capital expenditures, and working the balance sheet hard.
  • Foster result-oriented mind-set. The goal is inculcate disciplines so that they become part of the company's culture and create a repeatable formula for achieving results.
___________
"We love to discover companies with hidden gems like owned real estate which we can later sell and lease back, extracting our equity and reducing our base investment costs. It happens often and sellers could easily take advantage of these if they only reviewed their assets before selling to us." -  Mid-size private equity executive.




In conclusion
Studies show that the PE business model drives value well beyond wealth creation for the owners. PE firms rejuvenate companies, create jobs, and open new markets that benefit customers, employees, suppliers and the communities in which they operate.

_____________________________________________
Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

5 Things Bill Gates and other mega entrepreneurs have in common

Bill Gates' net worth is around $80 billion. He owns the $12.6 billion ownership of Microsoft. He also owns a $4.5 billion ownership in Canadian National Railroads, a $3 billion ownership in Republic Services, and a $2.8 billion ownership in in Ecolab. His diversified investments, through Cascade Investments, amount to $37.6 billion. 

As such, Microsoft, the company he started and associated with the most, stands for only 16% of his family wealth. 

Bill Gates is a mega entrepreneur. 

What sets very successful entrepreneurs, like Bill Bill Gates, apart from the rest? What turns them into mega entrepreneurs running a myriad of companies, overseeing immense and complex web of capital, and forging multigenerational wealth and legacy?

Here are some interesting statistics on mega entrepreneurs:
  • One third of FORTUNE 500 companies are owned or controlled by mega entrepreneurs or their families
  • 67% of NYSE companies are owned or controlled by mega entrepreneurs or their families
On the other hand:
  • About 30% of entrepreneur started and led business survive to the second generation
  • Only 12% make it to the third generation
  • Only 3% make it to the fourth generation
Many wonder what has become of the Rockefellers' ownership and clout over Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, Amoco, Standard Oil of Ohio, Atlantic Richfield, etc. We wonder as well, but its not there...anymore.

All entrepreneurs face the same challenges as they grow their start-ups in to successful companies:
  1. Raising capital without losing control 
  2. Recruiting and retaining top talent 
  3. Business continuation and succession 
  4. Converting profits and value to wealth
How mega entrepreneurs deal and keep dealing with the above challenges makes the difference. 

So, what sets mega entrepreneurs, apart from the rest? 

  1. Mega entrepreneurs have the "big-picture focus".
  2. They take risk and leverage financial and human capital to grow their enterprise.
  3. They rely on their entrepreneur's offices to manage finances, support M&A deals, raise or repay personal capital, execute financial reorganizations or restructure debt. Employees of their core companies are not involved in these processes. 
  4. Liquidity and cash management is given a high priority, managing cash efficiently and having it ready for difficult times and when great opportunities arise.
  5. Risk management is paramount.
Below are some examples of mega entrepreneurs and their strategies. 

Click the graphic to enlarge
Susanne Klatten: Dynasty Company as the Backbone of Dynasty Fortune. Wealth created though growth of a single company, BMW. Company is still a key asset of the family and its business identity. Other key assets are acquired and sold in line with “Dynasty Company” strategy

Click the graphic to enlarge
Leonardo Del Vecchio: Multi-Generational Family Company Leading to a Dynasty Fortune. Wealth creation through growth of a single company, Luxottica. Company is the identity of business family. Strategically and selectively diversifying dynasty fortune.

Click the graphic to enlarge
Bill Gates: Company Value Leading to a Multi-Company Family Fortune. Wealth creation though a growth of a single company, Microsoft. Diversification of holdings and assets. Establishment of strategic wealth thought.

Click the graphic to enlarge
Wang Jianlin: Diversified Entrepreneurships Leading to Family Fortune. Wealth creation through network of holdings growth. Increased concentration of holdings in key companies and assets. Strategic diversification across asset classes and geographies.

“The difference between a business family and a business dynasty is the strategy. Everything must be in line with strategy. Selling assets, exiting ventures… followed by reinvestment of capital – in everything strategy sets the rules.” - Baron Albert Frère, Founder and Chairman of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, one of the largest family enterprises.

Statistics & Graphics: Courtesy of Financial Strategist Board.



_____________________________________________
Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

How important is the financial "Big-Picture" focus?

How important is a strategy-driven and big picture focused financial mindset for the growth of enterprise and accumulation and preservation of capital?

It seems most successful entrepreneurs have the "big-picture focus".

Successful entrepreneurs have a habit of building one business, selling it fully or in part, and then moving on to the next—building wealth through a series of "equity events“.

Roughly 80% of typical entrepreneurs’ net worth is tied up in their companies. This changes over time as successful entrepreneurs grow business interests outside of the core business.

What are some of the challenges faced by entrepreneurs and business owners, as they grow their enterprises?
  1. Raising capital without losing control 
  2. Recruiting and retaining top talent 
  3. Business continuation and succession 
  4. Converting profits and value to wealth
How entrepreneurs and business owners deal with the above challenges makes a difference for their business enterprises,
“The difference between a business family and a business dynasty is the strategy. Everything must be in line with strategy. Selling assets, exiting ventures… followed by reinvestment of capital – in everything strategy sets the rules.” - Baron Albert Frère, Founder and Chairman of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, one of the largest family enterprises,
Here are some interesting statistics on family-owned businesses:
  • One third of FORTUNE 500 companies are owned or controlled by entrepreneurs or their families
  • 67% of NYSE companies are owned or controlled by entrepreneurs or their families
  • Only about 30% of family businesses survive to the second generation
  • Only 12% make it to the third generation
  • Only 3% make it to the fourth generation
  • 1 in 4 family businesses have a continuation plan
  • 37% have written a strategic plan
“The difference between a business family and a business dynasty is the ability to withstand the shocks of intergenerational transfer, combined with each generation’s ability to adapt”. - Rolland B. Hills, Chairman of Hill van Breen Continuity and Chair of Redmount Capital Partners advisory board.
Our observations identified that most successful entrepreneurs have a formal approach to managing their "big picture" - strategy setting and implementation, and financial and risk management.
  • Noticeably, for these, successful entrepreneurs rely on people outside of their core companies. 
  • They structure formal entrepreneur's offices or family offices for these purposes. Initially they may rely on shared Entrepreneur's Offices or family offices.
  • Strategic events, such as selling or buying companies, increasing or decreasing ownership in companies are handled by these structures
  • Raising or repaying personal capital, financial reorganizations, debt restructuring activities, etc. are evaluated and executed at these levels.
  • Cash management is given a high priority, striving to manage cash balances efficiently, See more on Cash Management 
  • Risk and liquidity management is paramount.
  • Employees or officers of their core companies are rarely involved in these processes.
Below are some examples of very successful entrepreneurs and family-owned company leaders, in our opinion, commanding a "Big-Picture" focus. 

Click the graphic to enlarge
Susanne Klatten: Dynasty Company as the Backbone of Dynasty Fortune. Wealth created though growth of a single company, BMW. Company is still a key asset of the family and its business identity. Other key assets are acquired and sold in line with “Dynasty Company” strategy

Click the graphic to enlarge
Leonardo Del Vecchio: Multi-Generational Family Company Leading to a Dynasty Fortune. Wealth creation through growth of a single company, Luxottica. Company is the identity of business family. Strategically and selectively diversifying dynasty fortune.

Click the graphic to enlarge
Bill Gates: Company Value Leading to a Multi-Company Family Fortune. Wealth creation though a growth of a single company, Microsoft. Diversification of holdings and assets. Establishment of strategic wealth thought.


Statistics: Courtesy of Financial Strategist Board.

_____________________________________________
Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

The Magic in selling a business interest.


Recently the partners of Redmount Capital were at a luncheon with Earvin Magic Johnson delivering a keynote speech.

We were hoping for some insight from Magic, in our mind the most successful pro-athlete entrepreneur, turning his athletic power into business empire. He built best-in-kind connections to propel his business juggernaut. His business visions are not only contrary to the consensus but also ahead of times.

Right away we were made aware that Magic is a genuinely fun person. He is charming yet highly opinionated.  We knew he was competitive but as he spoke we also learned how fond he is of a good competition. It seems he is not only in it to win it but also to get better. All along he was affectionate to the listeners, truly appreciating their interest and presence.

"So should I sell Lakers?"

As he spoke we kept looking for details in his entrepreneurial ways. He let us as he brought up the
sale of his ownership in LA Lakers. Magic acquired interest in to the team in 1994. In 2010 the news
of his LA Lakers sale took many by surprise, Most people thought that he was making a mistake and that he will come to regret it. 

At the luncheon Magic explained why he decided on the sale. LA Lakers were doing as good as they have ever done...or could have ever done. Kobe was getting older. Magic had another plan in the works. He was just looking for the right offer. 

What was his plan? His purchase, in partnership with Guggenheim, of LA Dodgers.

Magic knew Dodgers presented a similar opportunity as Lakers in 1994, only larger. He realized that he needed capital. which he could obtain, if he sold something. He also knew that he needed his focused attention on Dodgers.

Several well-known billionaire investors were ready to partner with him in the Dodgers deal. Choosing the right one seemed easy but he wanted himself to be a large investor in the deal. He wanted to call the shots and make good money.

Prior to that, several offers were received by Magic to consider selling Lakers, but he was looking for the "right offer". He did not elaborate what he thought the "right offer" was. We suspect he knew what it would look like - at a right price and timed to let him get the Dodgers' deal done.

"So should I sell Lakers?" Magic asked us all in the room, extending the microphone towards us. "You guys are smart enough, you have clients like me". "Yes", spoke the group. Magic nodded in satisfaction, with his smile getting brighter.



In 2010 Earvin Magic Johnson effectively exchanged his ownership in LA Lakers for the one in LA Dodgers. A classic replacement of a business interest in a stage of diminishing returns for a one with remaining opportunities. Another plus, the business was bigger with higher RIE (Return on Invested Effort). 

This may just be the Magic approach to selling a business interest.

Photo by Curtis E. Hollowell, Redmount Capital Partners.