As Credit Tightens, Entrepreneurs and Dealmakers Turn to Non-Traditional Lenders

After what occurred in 2000 and 2008, one should have expected banks and other common lenders to become more regulated and scrutinized. Though this may have created some inconveniences for some firms, it helped open the door for others. Banks have established more rigorous qualifications for companies to be given financing, and capital constraints and shareholder activism are becoming more influential when it comes to publicly traded business development companies (BDC). For middle markets in particular, this has allowed alternative lenders to emerge and acquire more market share than would otherwise have been possible, because of the vast amount of competitors.

“Banks have established more rigorous qualifications for companies…”

With public perception of banks still relatively low and regulators keeping a close watch, it is not difficult to see why banks want to keep a low profile and not conduct any business that may raise a red flag. In 2015, 25% of middle market loan transactions featured deals of more than 6x EBITDA; an example given by regulators as a possible red flag. It is why most traditional bank lenders are currently staying away from making leveraged loans deals on private equity firm deals.

Similarly, BDC’s are also currently sourcing fewer deals. They are currently facing difficulties in raising capital, because as of March, most were trading below book value. This has prevented many from issuing new equity for funding. Without cash to fund new transactions, the only alternative would be to fund from repayment on existing loans.

Collateralized loan obligation (CLO) issuances are on the decline. About $4 billion in CLOs were priced for what was most of the first quarter, a harsh decline from almost $17 billion during the same time period just last year. During 2013-2015, the CLO market grew by more than 50%. However, the market has decreased by about 50% during the past year. Additionally, under the Volcker Rule which is set to take effect at the end of 2016, managers will be required to hold 5% of their CLOs. Though many managers are attempting to adapt and others are selling off their CLOs, it remains to be seen how the rest of the market reacts.

Finally, we come to the benefactors. Alternative lenders are currently taking advantage of the current state of the lending market with great vigor. A great advantage they have is being able to act quickly and with much flexibility. This is possible, because most are either non-regulated or regulated far less than traditional lenders. These alternative lenders are beginning to develop close relationships with private equity firms for these particular reasons, which helps PE firms acquire financing for deals, and as a result fund the investments in their portfolios. Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) funds are also benefiting from the current state of the financing landscape, especially considering the two new regulatory changes made at the end of last year; reduced registration requirements by advisors and the amount of capital an SBIC can control has been raised to $350 million from $225 million.

Though the availability of attaining financing has become more difficult, not all have been affected negatively. The financing landscape will improve, but in the short-term, in its current state, we should expect alternative lenders to become more prominent players in the space.

__________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

3Q 2015 Private Equity Environment

Global equity markets fell sharply in the third quarter, driven by concerns over slowing global growth, particularly in China, and uncertainty over the U.S. Federal Reserve’s monetary policy. The MSCI World Index declined by 8.3% in the third quarter, the index’s worst quarterly performance since the third quarter of 2011. Nearly every single-country equity index posted a loss, led by the Shanghai Composite, which declined by 27.9% during the quarter despite a raft of measures undertaken by the Chinese government to stem the sell-off. Other emerging markets and commodities also declined significantly, weighted down by fears of contagion and the knock-on effects of a slowdown in China. The S&P GSCI index, which measures a basket of 24 different commodities, declined by 19.3% in the third quarter, which brought the index to its lowest level since 1999.

Highlights

• Equity market volatility adversely impacted IPO issuance during the quarter. Global IPO issuance in 3Q15 totaled $13.6 billion, a 76.8% decline from 3Q14 and the lowest quarterly total since 1Q12. 
• Global buyout investment activity has increased only moderately over the past few years, and 2015 is on track to continue the trend. YTD 3Q15 buyout transaction activity totaled $289.8 billion, an increase of 2.7% over YTD 3Q14
• PE firms worldwide raised $58.1 billion in 3Q15, a 43% decrease from the prior quarter and a 31% decrease from 3Q14. The decrease was driven by buyout- and U.S.-focused fundraising activity

Private Equity Investment Activity
U.S. Buyout Investment Activity

U.S. buyout investment activity totaled $55.8 billion during the third quarter of 2015, down approximately 14% from both the prior quarter and the same period in 2014, according to data from

Thomson Reuters. This brought total U.S. buyout investment activity for the first three quarters
of the year to $190 billion, a decline of 5% from the same period in 2014. The year-over-year decline in investment activity is reflective of the increasing wariness of many general partners in the face of rising valuations in a competitive market environment. Many general partners are setting a high bar for new investments, which is restraining overall investment activity. The average purchase-price-to-EBITDA multiple (across all transaction sizes) for new buyout
investments was 10.3x for the first three quarters of 2015, up from 9.7x for all of 2014, according to S&P LCD. Although average purchase-price multiples are increasing, general partners continue to be disciplined and are structuring their transactions conservatively: the average equity contribution
rate for a buyout transaction completed so far this year is 40.8%, and the average debt-to-EBITDA multiple is 5.6x; the corresponding rate and multiple for all of 2014 are 37.0%
and 5.7x, respectively (see table 3).

Non-investment-grade debt markets were not immune to financial market volatility during the third quarter. The BofA Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II index generated a –4.9% return in the third

quarter, which drove an increase in its option-adjusted spread to 662 basis points over U.S. Treasuries—its highest level since June 2012. U.S. leveraged loan issuance totaled $115 billion in the third quarter, a decline of 14.8% from the year-ago period. Year-to-date 2015, U.S. leveraged loan issuance totaled $341 billion, a 24.3% decline from the same period in 2014. The decline in leveraged
loan issuance was due to a number of factors, including the slowdown in buyout investment activity in recent quarters, a shift toward more-conservative financing structures (which occurred as a result of the banking industry’s new leveraged lending guidelines), and the recent increase in credit spreads (which is tempering issuer appetites).

The largest announced U.S.-based buyout transaction during the quarter was the $12.6 billion acquisition of Oncor, a Texas-based electric transmission company, by a syndicate of investors including the Hunt Group, Avenue Capital, Centerbridge Capital, and GSO Partners. If completed, this would also be the largest buyout transaction of the year thus far. The investor group is acquiring Oncor from Energy Future Holdings, which is currently in bankruptcy court, eight years after its record-setting buyout led by KKR and TPG. Other notable buyout transactions announced during the
quarter include the $8.0 billion carve-out of Veritas from Symantec, led by Carlyle Group, and the $6.5 billion take-private of insurance software provider Solera, led by Vista Equity Partners.

Fundraising Market

Private equity firms worldwide raised $58.1 billion in the third quarter of 2015, a 43% decrease from the prior quarter and a 31% decrease from the $84.7 billion raised in the year-ago quarter, according to Thomson Reuters. The third quarter figure brought year-to-date worldwide private equity
fundraising to $246 billion, which is just slightly ahead of the $245 billion raised over the same period in 2014.

The quarter-over-quarter decrease in worldwide private equity fundraising was primarily driven by U.S.-focused funds, which raised $31.5 billion in the third quarter—a 58% decrease
from the prior quarter and a 44% decrease from the year-ago quarter. Significant decreases relative to the second quarter of 2015 occurred in each major strategy. After strong starts to the year for both U.S. buyout and venture capital fundraising, the strategies raised just $13.6 billion and $4.6
billion, respectively, which rank 33% and 24% below the average quarterly levels experienced for their strategies over the past five years. Notable U.S.-focused fund closings during the third quarter include American Industrial Partners VI, which raised $1.8 billion, and Insight Venture Partners IX, which held its final closing at $3.3 billion.

Europe-focused funds raised $19.9 billion during the third quarter, flat from the prior quarter but up 8% from the amount raised in the year-ago quarter. The primary driver of the region’s year-over-year increase was the growth in venture capital fundraising: the $3.0 billion raised during the third quarter was the highest quarterly total since the fourth quarter of 2008. Asia-Pacific-focused funds raised $5.9 billion during the quarter, an 83% increase from the measured second quarter; however, the year-to-date total of $14.7 billion raised in 2015 represents less than 50% of the corresponding 2014 total. The largest Asia-Pacific-focused fundraising round held during the third quarter was that of Chinese venture capital fund Shunwei China Internet Fund III, which closed on $1.0 billion. 

During the third quarter, buyout funds raised $30.3 billion, a 43% decrease from the prior quarter (or a decrease of 15% when excluding the $17.0 billion close of Blackstone Capital Partners VII in the second quarter). Fundraising within the segment was broad-based: nine buyout-focused partnerships raised $1.0 billion or greater, highlighted by EQT VII, which closed on $7.4 billion, the largest amount raised during the quarter. Fundraising for venture capital–focused funds remained relatively flat during the third quarter: the $9.9 billion raised worldwide represented a 5% decrease

from the prior quarter and a 5% increase from the year-ago quarter. The aforementioned decline in U.S. venture capital fundraising, combined with a greater than 70% increase in quarter-over-quarter fundraising in every other major global region, resulted in just 46% of the worldwide venture capital
fundraising total being raised in the United States—the lowest percentage raised by the region since the fourth quarter
of 2011.

Energy-focused fundraising experienced a significant slowdown during the third quarter, following three consecutive quarters of record-setting activity. Energy funds raised $5.5 billion, which represents a 27% decrease from the strategy’s 5-year quarterly average of $7.5 billion. Despite the decrease in overall volume, notable firms in the energy private equity space continued to accumulate significant amounts of capital following the downturn in oil and natural gas prices: Ridgewood Energy Oil & Gas III ($1.6 billion), Apollo Natural Resources Partners II ($1.3 billion), and ArcLight Energy Partners VI ($0.9 billion) accounted for 70% of the quarterly energy fundraising total. Fundraising for other private equity strategies (i.e., subordinated debt, infrastructure, and special
situations) represented 21% of the total amount raised during the third quarter.

Source: Pathway Capital, Bloomberg, S&P LCD. 

Note: Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Redmount accepts no responsibility or liability (including for indirect, consequential or incidental damages) for any error, omission or inaccuracy of such information. The projections shown are provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or providing any assurance or guarantee as to returns that may be realized in the future from your private equity commitments. Projections and expected returns are subject to high levels of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect future performance.Accordingly, such projections/expectations should be viewed as only one possibility out of a broad range of possible outcomes.

__________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

5 Things Bill Gates and other mega entrepreneurs have in common

Bill Gates' net worth is around $80 billion. He owns the $12.6 billion ownership of Microsoft. He also owns a $4.5 billion ownership in Canadian National Railroads, a $3 billion ownership in Republic Services, and a $2.8 billion ownership in in Ecolab. His diversified investments, through Cascade Investments, amount to $37.6 billion. 

As such, Microsoft, the company he started and associated with the most, stands for only 16% of his family wealth. 

Bill Gates is a mega entrepreneur. 

What sets very successful entrepreneurs, like Bill Bill Gates, apart from the rest? What turns them into mega entrepreneurs running a myriad of companies, overseeing immense and complex web of capital, and forging multigenerational wealth and legacy?

Here are some interesting statistics on mega entrepreneurs:

• One third of FORTUNE 500 companies are owned or controlled by mega entrepreneurs or their families
• 67% of NYSE companies are owned or controlled by mega entrepreneurs or their families

On the other hand:

• About 30% of entrepreneur started and led business survive to the second generation
• Only 12% make it to the third generation
• Only 3% make it to the fourth generation

Many wonder what has become of the Rockefellers' ownership and clout over Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, Amoco, Standard Oil of Ohio, Atlantic Richfield, etc. We wonder as well, but its not there...anymore.

All entrepreneurs face the same challenges as they grow their start-ups in to successful companies:

1. Raising capital without losing control 
2. Recruiting and retaining top talent 
3. Business continuation and succession 
4. Converting profits and value to wealth

How mega entrepreneurs deal and keep dealing with the above challenges makes the difference. 

So, what sets mega entrepreneurs, apart from the rest? 

1. Mega entrepreneurs have the "big-picture focus".
2. They take risk and leverage financial and human capital to grow their enterprise.
3. They rely on their entrepreneur's offices to manage finances, support M&A deals, raise or repay personal capital, execute financial reorganizations or restructure debt. Employees of their core companies are not involved in these processes. 
4. Liquidity and cash management is given a high priority, managing cash efficiently and having it ready for difficult times and when great opportunities arise.
5. Risk management is paramount.

Below are some examples of mega entrepreneurs and their strategies. 

Click the graphic to enlarge
Susanne Klatten: Dynasty Company as the Backbone of Dynasty Fortune. Wealth created though growth of a single company, BMW. Company is still a key asset of the family and its business identity. Other key assets are acquired and sold in line with “Dynasty Company” strategy

Click the graphic to enlarge
Leonardo Del Vecchio: Multi-Generational Family Company Leading to a Dynasty Fortune. Wealth creation through growth of a single company, Luxottica. Company is the identity of business family. Strategically and selectively diversifying dynasty fortune.

Click the graphic to enlarge
Bill Gates: Company Value Leading to a Multi-Company Family Fortune. Wealth creation though a growth of a single company, Microsoft. Diversification of holdings and assets. Establishment of strategic wealth thought.

Click the graphic to enlarge
Wang Jianlin: Diversified Entrepreneurships Leading to Family Fortune. Wealth creation through network of holdings growth. Increased concentration of holdings in key companies and assets. Strategic diversification across asset classes and geographies.

“The difference between a business family and a business dynasty is the strategy. Everything must be in line with strategy. Selling assets, exiting ventures… followed by reinvestment of capital – in everything strategy sets the rules.” - Baron Albert Frère, Founder and Chairman of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, one of the largest family enterprises.

Statistics & Graphics: Courtesy of Financial Strategist Board.

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

Unlocking resources through better corporate cash management

Companies call on the full resources of their cash management, as they need to grow, execute CapEx or acquisitions.

But going an extra step gives financial managers a chance to help benefit their organization in a less-than-usual way.

The financial manager has an excellent opportunity to contribute strategically to a company's growth, by demonstrating how working capital can be leveraged to serve as a financing and risk management tool in conjunction with, or in addition to, traditional funding methods. This can help strengthen the capital plan and help improve the debt structure.

The benefits of freeing up cash to grow a company:

Reduced financing requirements

• Existing cash is typically the cheapest form of financing. Using it to finance growth, including for CapEx or acquisitions, can reduce the external financing expense of stock or bond issuance. 
• The cash released from
  
  working capital in this instance, should be valued at a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) or, alternatively, the cost of financing the growth should be included in the capital plan typically developed by the financial management team. 
• In the example above, established working capital standards, can guide a company to release a sizable amount of cash, which applied at a well structured WACC can generate benefit for the company.

CLICK HERE

Look out for financial ratios and credit ratings

• Credit rating agencies like D&B review company balance sheets. 
• Rating agencies usually look upon increases in free cash flow as a positive factor during this process; however, it’s important to note that agencies may penalize companies that ineffectively manage their working capital compared to their peers.

A positive impact on company strength and valuation

• When looking at a discounted cash flow valuation, the release of working capital that can be achieved by the company would translate as an increase in cash, ultimately improving the valuation of the company.
• This needs to be looked at carefully and conservatively to ensure that all improvements can indeed be achieved; the finance team is in a prime position to evaluate this.
• When using weighted average cost of capital, including working capital release in the calculation may boost a company's financials through a one-off increase in free cash flow.
• Although working capital is priced into a corporate acquisition, the full potential of the synergies often go unrealized when the treasury team, which handles working capital daily, isn’t involved early in negotiations.
• Working capital is often looked at with more detail in private equity deals, as it is the goal of financial sponsors to maximize asset allocation and drive quick shareholder returns.

More funds for growth

• Cash unlocked from working capital may help a company grow more quickly, facilitating integration and reducing the execution risk from a cash flow requirement perspective.
• Strategic events such as mergers, acquisitions, sales, reorganization, etc. provide the perfect opportunity to review the working capital position of the company. 
• Although the review of working capital and improved management of cash may require some efforts, (improve processes, deploy new banking solutions, and change policies), uncovering these funds can sometimes can release sizable cash to the company's balance sheet.

Released cash can add up quickly

Even a one-day improvement in working capital management parameters can have a profound impact and the finance management leadership plays an important role in this.

Working capital release techniques could be bank-led solutions such as factoring, supply chain finance and card solution, or internal re-engineering such as supplier and customer payment terms standardization. A centralized liquidity structure automated at an in-house bank level can also move the needle in terms of the funding mix of long-term versus short-term debt structures.

As another internal example, larger companies execute ‘payment runs’ on a weekly or fortnightly basis. As these payment files usually are designed to have all payments processed on that same day, the company often ends up paying invoices earlier than their due date (invoices due in the following

week or two) to avoid the cost of executing daily payment runs. Changing this process so that payments are ‘warehoused’ at the bank level until the invoice due date can be a quick and easy way to release working capital, often resulting in a three-day extension of Days Payables Outstanding.

The example above illustrates how the finance manager’s knowledge of the organization’s cash flow can help establish what the achievable extension of company's days payable outstanding is, and therefore, what the subsequent reduction in the cash conversion cycle would be.

Best practices to consider

• Involve finance staff as often as possible in to decision-making process.
• In M&A situations finance team can propose the use of cash from working capital as a funding option.
• Identify the focus areas for working capital release.
• Prioritize the deployment of processes and policies, which can quickly release cash from the working capital to accelerate the funding growth.
• Centralize treasury operations: consider using shared service centers to standardize payments flows and leverage funding from an in-house bank with automated cash concentration structures.
• Hand off functions to banks, such as the financing of some of the strategic suppliers through a supply chain finance program, or the management of some local processes (such as payment file translations).

Note: Calculations of Working Capital used for the examples in this document follow the bellow formulas:

Days Payable Outstanding [DPO] = (Trade Accounts Payable / Cost of Goods Sold) * 365
Days Receivable Outstanding [DSO] = (Trade Accounts Receivable / Revenue) *365
Days Inventory Outstanding [DIO] = (Inventory / Revenue) * 365
Cash Conversion Cycle [CCC] = DSO – DPO + DIO

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

2Q 2015 Private Equity Environment

Market Overview
Global equity markets were rattled late in the second quarter with the prospect of a Greek debt default

and exit from Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). On the second-to-last trading day of the quarter, following Greece’s decision to hold a referendum on the terms of a new debt bailout deal, the MSCI Europe index declined by 2.7%—its largest daily decline since October 2014. In the United States, the S&P 500 declined by more than 2%, which erased the index’s gains for the year. Asian
equity markets also sold off on the news, although most of the region’s equity indices finished the quarter with gains. Fixed income markets performed poorly overall in the second quarter. In particular, despite the commencement of the European Central Bank’s (ECB’s) quantitative easing program that drove much of the eurozone’s sovereign debt market into negative yield territory early in the quarter, euro-area government bonds experienced their largest-ever

quarterly loss, driven by concerns that yields had fallen too low in light of an improving economic outlook for the region.

Highlights

• M&A exit transaction value for PE-backed companies totaled $174 billion in 1H15—a decline of 34.8% from the record-setting 1H14 total but still one of the largest first-half totals ever recorded.
• High-yield default rates remain below historical averages in both the U.S. and Europe. However, sales of nonperforming loans reached a record high of €91 billion in 2014 and are expected to increase further in 2015.
  
• PE firms worldwide raised $92.1 billion in 2Q15, a 9% increase over the prior quarter and a 17% increase over the year-ago quarter. The increase was driven by buyout- and U.S.-focused fundraising activity.

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

How important is the financial "Big-Picture" focus?

How important is a strategy-driven and big picture focused financial mindset for the growth of enterprise and accumulation and preservation of capital?

It seems most successful entrepreneurs have the "big-picture focus".

Successful entrepreneurs have a habit of building one business, selling it fully or in part, and then moving on to the next—building wealth through a series of "equity events“.

Roughly 80% of typical entrepreneurs’ net worth is tied up in their companies. This changes over time as successful entrepreneurs grow business interests outside of the core business.

What are some of the challenges faced by entrepreneurs and business owners, as they grow their enterprises?

1. Raising capital without losing control 
2. Recruiting and retaining top talent 
3. Business continuation and succession 
4. Converting profits and value to wealth

How entrepreneurs and business owners deal with the above challenges makes a difference for their business enterprises,

“The difference between a business family and a business dynasty is the strategy. Everything must be in line with strategy. Selling assets, exiting ventures… followed by reinvestment of capital – in everything strategy sets the rules.” - Baron Albert Frère, Founder and Chairman of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, one of the largest family enterprises,

Here are some interesting statistics on family-owned businesses:

• One third of FORTUNE 500 companies are owned or controlled by entrepreneurs or their families
• 67% of NYSE companies are owned or controlled by entrepreneurs or their families
• Only about 30% of family businesses survive to the second generation
• Only 12% make it to the third generation
• Only 3% make it to the fourth generation
• 1 in 4 family businesses have a continuation plan
• 37% have written a strategic plan

“The difference between a business family and a business dynasty is the ability to withstand the shocks of intergenerational transfer, combined with each generation’s ability to adapt”. - Rolland B. Hills, Chairman of Hill van Breen Continuity and Chair of Redmount Capital Partners advisory board.

Our observations identified that most successful entrepreneurs have a formal approach to managing their "big picture" - strategy setting and implementation, and financial and risk management.

• Noticeably, for these, successful entrepreneurs rely on people outside of their core companies. 
• They structure formal entrepreneur's offices or family offices for these purposes. Initially they may rely on shared Entrepreneur's Offices or family offices.
• Strategic events, such as selling or buying companies, increasing or decreasing ownership in companies are handled by these structures
• Raising or repaying personal capital, financial reorganizations, debt restructuring activities, etc. are evaluated and executed at these levels.
• Cash management is given a high priority, striving to manage cash balances efficiently, See more on Cash Management 
• Risk and liquidity management is paramount.
• Employees or officers of their core companies are rarely involved in these processes.

Below are some examples of very successful entrepreneurs and family-owned company leaders, in our opinion, commanding a "Big-Picture" focus. 

Click the graphic to enlarge
Susanne Klatten: Dynasty Company as the Backbone of Dynasty Fortune. Wealth created though growth of a single company, BMW. Company is still a key asset of the family and its business identity. Other key assets are acquired and sold in line with “Dynasty Company” strategy

Click the graphic to enlarge
Leonardo Del Vecchio: Multi-Generational Family Company Leading to a Dynasty Fortune. Wealth creation through growth of a single company, Luxottica. Company is the identity of business family. Strategically and selectively diversifying dynasty fortune.

Click the graphic to enlarge
Bill Gates: Company Value Leading to a Multi-Company Family Fortune. Wealth creation though a growth of a single company, Microsoft. Diversification of holdings and assets. Establishment of strategic wealth thought.


Statistics: Courtesy of Financial Strategist Board.

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

U.S. cash balances remain high

Investors are continuing to hoard cash and keep more and more capital in short-term assets.

Source: Investment Company Institute data, Federal Reserve, and Bloomberg. *Total cash and short-term assets include money market assets (ICI), large time deposits, all commercial banks, NSA (not seasonally adjusted), savings deposits, and small time deposits.

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

Is the Corporate M&A Bubble in Trouble?

We think its not...yet. The current level of activity suggests that corporate managers will continue to buy rather than build.

In a recent CNBC poll, some 56% of companies said that they plan an acquisition in the coming year, up from 40% last October and the first time since 2010 that more than half plan to do something. But even if such plans were to generate a surge later this year, it would make a bullish argument for equities, not the bearish one accompanying much of this recent buzz.

M&A, quite simply, is a vote of confidence in market values and the future generally. Companies buy each other when they see a reason to expand and when other firms look attractively cheap. The same goes for private equity, which is no less in the acquisition business than corporations. If these decision makers saw stocks as expensive, they would pursue their expansion with direct investments in new equipment, premises, and in a hiring program. Since they are buying these days and doing relatively little building, they have effectively announced that stock values still make a purchase the more attractive way to expand.

Table 1. M&A Activity (monthly rates)

Period	Number of Deals	Value ($ in bil.)
2013 4Q	817	$79.6
2014 1Q	959	$108.7
2Q	1,000	154.8
3Q	1,003	108.1
October	1,123	96.5
November	1,006	194.0
December	983	103.6
2015 January	995	$78.4
February	938	114.3

Source: FactSet

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

The effects of bulging corporate purses.

High cash levels, accumulated by S&P 500 corporations, are being put to work. Above charts are showing growing levels of capital expenditures, M&A activities, dividends, and stock buybacks by the nation's largest corporations.

If sustainable, this will benefit the economy. Capital expenditures can add to the industrial growth. Dividends and stock buybacks will probably add to consumer spending and housing sector strength. Corporate mergers and acquisition activities may strengthen equity markets.

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.

The Secrets to Valuing Hot Tech Companies.

This week Bloomberg Business shed some light on on this.

The opinion was built around a photo-messaging app raising cash at a $15 billion valuation. Bloomberg Business doubts that this company is actually worth more than Clorox or Campbell Soup and was curious where did investors come up with that enormous headline number?

Here's the secret, Bloomberg thinks, to how Silicon Valley calculates the value of its hottest companies: The numbers are sort of made-up. For the most mature startups, investors agree to grant higher valuations, which help the companies with recruitment and building credibility, in exchange for guarantees that they'll get their money back first if the company goes public or sells. They can also negotiate to receive additional free shares if a subsequent round's valuation is less favorable. Interviews with more than a dozen founders, venture capitalists, and the attorneys who draw up investment contracts reveal the most common financial provisions used in private-market technology deals today.

The backroom agreements are becoming more common as tech companies stay private longer, according to the interviews and financial documents obtained by Bloomberg Business. The practice obfuscates the meaning of a valuation, which can become dangerous down the road because private investors aren't taking the same risks a public-market shareholder would. By the time a company does go public, the valuation it got from VCs may not align with its balance sheet. 

Our own opinion? The above is not exactly a great confidence builder.

_____________________________________________

Clicking the Like button on various social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. does not constitute a testimonial for or endorsement of Redmount Capital Partners LLC or any Investment Advisor Representative. “Like” is not meant in the traditional sense. Posts must refrain from recommending investment advisory services or providing testimonials for our firm, since they are strictly prohibited. Please understand that we are required to delete such posts, since this is a regulatory requirement.